SWB vs Telex Release: How to Choose the Right Ocean Cargo Release Method
Publish Time: 2025-05-07 Origin: Site
Key Differences at a Glance
| Feature | Sea Waybill (SWB) | Telex Release |
|---|---|---|
| Legal Nature | Non-negotiable transport document | Electronic release authorization |
| Ownership Transfer | Impossible (fixed consignee) | Requires original B/L surrender |
| Release Speed | Immediate upon arrival | 1-2 business days after request |
| Security Level | Medium (pre-set consignee) | High (carrier verification) |
| Best For | Trusted partners/rush shipments | Delayed document scenarios |
When to Use Each Method
? Sea Waybill (SWB) Ideal For:
Established trade relationships
Example: OEM supplier shipping to long-term manufacturer
Time-sensitive deliveries
Saves 5-7 days vs waiting for original B/L
Intra-company transfers
Parent-to-subsidiary shipments
?? SWB Risks:
No cargo control after shipment
Limited dispute resolution (no document leverage)
? Telex Release Ideal For:
Document delays
B/L stuck in banking/payment processes
Multi-party transactions
Allows final consignee changes pre-arrival
High-value goods
Carrier confirms identity before release
?? Telex Release Risks:
Fraud potential if email hacked
Some ports require 48h notice (e.g., Lagos)
Step-by-Step Process Comparison
SWB Workflow:
Shipper issues SWB naming fixed consignee
Carrier delivers to named party upon arrival
Consignee claims with ID (no document needed)
Telex Release Workflow:
Shipper submits B/L surrender request to carrier
Carrier verifies and emails release to destination agent
Consignee presents ID + release confirmation
Cost & Time Savings
| Metric | SWB | Telex Release |
|---|---|---|
| Document Handling | $0 (no B/L) | $50-100 fee |
| Release Time | 0 days | 1-2 days |
| Bank Processing | Not applicable | LC complications |
Pro Tip:
"Use SWB for routine shipments with trusted buyers, but insist on Telex Release when letters of credit are involved—it maintains document control until payment."
— Maersk Trade Finance Specialist